1:48 PM 10/10/2017 – It will be good if the present investigations would shed some light on 9/11 too, we need it.

Spread the Knowledge

1
1
Share

This is from my email to Seth Hettena, he stimulated some thinking. I recommend reading his blog.

From this brief description: “The Scorpion and The Frog” I got the impression that the Stinger sales were a diversionary step by the GRU to direct the attention to bin Laden as the future culprit and cover for their own future role in 9/11. This sale could not have happened without them, it is clear. The previous “show” of the “radar guidance system” was a preliminary confidence-building gesture, which tells us that it was them, the GRU, who was interested in these contacts to build a future cover. The episode with publishing the book also looks like their job: to enhance publicity for the future cover. Sater was used then and later as a useful intermediary, probably a man of Mogilevich, who apparently has very close GRU connections.

Just some thoughts. It will be good if the present investigations would shed some light on 9/11 too, we need it.

But the point is that if the GRU used Sater as the intermediary in their hypothetical pre-9/11 diversionary operation with Stinger missiles, to use Bin Laden as a cover, why couldn’t they use him the second time, in their hypothetical “operation Trump”?

M.N.

10.10.17

Spread the Knowledge

1
1
Share

4
Shares
4

The Meshuggah – Demiurge Or The German Hypothesis Of The Operations “Trump” And “9/11” – By Michael Novakhov

_____________________

1:40 AM 7/30/2018 – “It was a farce, a parody…” – MASKS OFF: an interview with a Russian ex-troll – YouTube – July 30, 2018

M.N.: This testimonial confirms that the Russian “trolling operations” were more for the show than anything else. This “ex-troll” insists that these “operations” were not under the professional Russian Intelligence Services umbrella but they were some amateurish and rather sloppy enterprise. This, the “commercial, for hire version” of trolling fits well conceptually with the German Hypothesis of the Operation “Trump”: these services were simply subcontracted by the others to create the impression of trolling and the crude interference. These trolling operations were not hidden but they were ostentatiously, on purpose, obvious. They were meant to be noticed and investigated. The same might apply to the 12 “GRU officers” indicted by Mueller: they are the former GRU officers. They might have been engaged commercially by the same German Intelligence through the intermediaries. There is no such thing as “former” GRU or any other security services officer. They might have kept their “alma mater” well informed about all these activities but it is possible that the highly professional GRU simply did not want to have anything to do with these sloppy, amateurishly obvious, semi-professional “operations” which were performed for hire and for the show. It is also possible that they know much more than this. That is why the sharing of information by them, the GRU, and the other involved and well informed Russian agencies and organisations could be helpful for the investigations if it is offered and performed in good faith. And I hope that it will be offered in good faith, because eventually it might be beneficial for Russia, if the situation with her involvement is cleared, eased, or mitigated.

I do not think, if I remember correctly, that I saw so far the definitive proof that those people were the active service GRU officers in 2016, at the time of the hacks. Maybe they were, but this proof has to be presented.

Michael Novakhov

1:52 AM 7/30/2018

“It was a farce, a parody…”

mikenova shared this story .

MASKS OFF: an interview with a Russian ex-troll – YouTube

Chinese (Simplified)